Best interests or conflict of interest?
One issue that has been brewing for too long, but is now coming to a head in wealth planning, is the regulation of those who provide financial-product sales advice and financial planning services – often offered under the nomenclature of estate planning or retirement planning advice. There is a lot of movement afoot as many jurisdictions, including my home jurisdiction of Ontario, other Canadian provinces and the US, grapple with how best to regulate those who offer such services, given the lack of a modernised, comprehensive legal framework for doing so.
One of the burning issues is whether or not a statutory ‘best interests’ standard should apply. In many jurisdictions, there is at present no express statutory obligation for those who provide financial-product sales and advice (as opposed to portfolio managers), and financial planning advice, to act in the client’s best interests. In many jurisdictions, financial planning as an activity is not subject to a general regulatory framework; often, the provision of financial-product sales and advice generally is subject only to know-your-client and suitability requirements.
Best interests
Following the lead of Australia, the UK and the US, some jurisdictions are now considering adopting the ‘fiduciary rule’. The Trump Administration, however, has now ordered a review of the rule and its implementation; it should have come into effect in April 2017, but has been delayed. Meanwhile, many US financial institutions have decided to implement the best interests rule anyway, as they recognise that client expectations demand it. In the US, the rule would apply only to advisors for retirement accounts and aims to prevent conflicts of interest where clients are pushed to buy investment products for which the advisor receives commissions.
In Canada, the major banks are under attack in a controversy that has recently arisen over aggressive sales tactics, including the allegation that bank employees, including tellers, sometimes presenting themselves as advisors, push products on clients to meet strict sales targets. Calls have been made for a parliamentary inquiry on the banks’ sales practices.
An overarching concern is that many clients have the expectation and belief that the financial advice and financial and estate planning services they receive are based on their best interests, with no understanding that their advisor may have a conflict of interest and may not be providing objective advice, in particular where their compensation is a commission or other financial reward based on sales.
Please login to access this content
If you are not a member, find out more about joining STEP or subscribing to STEP articles.